Salvador Gutierrez P7 Jan. 03-08

This week in AP Psychology:  I learned about sleep, hypnosis, and dreams.  What I liked the most was the stuff on dreams.  Dreams consist only of your past experiences and of what you already know.  Last year, I began a sleep journal.  I would go online to the dream dictionary and see what things meant.  But it turns out that it all depends on your interpretation rather than someone else’s because it’s your dream and your thoughts and feelings.  For example, a horse can mean freedom and stamina to someone but it can also mean grandfather to someone else.
After watching Inception, I began to try to have a lucid dream.  I did all the tricks and no good.  I wrote the letter “A” on both my palms, counted sheep (in order to keep counting once the dream starts and then I would realize I’m in a dream and then I can stop counting and have fun), and I would try to notice the little details that can give away that I’m in a dream (i.e. I’m reading a book and the letters would change every time I would look away, I’m in one location and then I would end up somewhere completely different just by going through the door).  I didn’t continue the sleep journal that I mentioned earlier, but I will try to continue on this journal.  I’m still not able to remember my dreams with the right amount of detail to figure out my unconscious, but I will soon.  Remembering my dreams will help me in life because dreams are like simulations and they can teach you the best possible thing to do in certain situations.

Salvador Gutierrez P7 Nov. 29 - Dec.04

This week in AP Psychology: we learned about the different parenting styles.  I pay more attention to my parents trying to figure out which style they fall into.  Both my parents are authoritative.  But my mom is a bit more permissive towards me now that I am older.  I am glad my parents are not Asian.  I know not all Asians are authoritarian but most of them are.  I have asked my Asian friends (Korean, Thailand, Taiwanese, Japanese, Chinese, Indian, and Bangladesh) what parenting style their parents are and most of them said authoritarian.  A Korean friend of mine has authoritative parents but they are authoritarian on certain issues like school.  I also know that not all Caucasian parents are permissive, but most of them are.  I think I am going to be an authoritative parent when I have kids.  It is the one style with the most benefits.  I am also going to be authoritative since it is the only way I know how to parent.  Everyone ends up to be like their parents because it is the only way they know how to parent.  I think being authoritarian will make your children dislike you and take you for granted.  And being permissive will make your children miserable because they do not have any guidance or fatherly figure to look up to.  I think being permissive shows how little you love and care for your children.  Every time I see a parent with his/her child, I try to figure out what kind of parent they are.  I am a bit confused on how there are only 3 styles.  There have got to be more.

Salvador Gutierrez P7 Nov. 08-10

This (half) week in AP Psychology: we learned about sensation and perception.  There are a few terms that I can relate my life to.  For example, I constantly notice that my sensitivity decreases the more I am stimulated.  I do not even notice anymore when my sister is talking, when my brother is whining and complaining, or the sirens from the police and fire men because I hear it so much.  It also happens when I am listening to music.  After a few minutes, I do not even notice that the music is still playing.  As I was writing that, I remembered that the music was playing.  I have even slept with the headphones still on (which is why I do not listen to music when I sleep anymore because I could seriously choke).  A few years ago, the school nurse sent me to the doctor because she thought I was going deaf since I failed the hearing test about three times.  But I did perfectly fine at the doctor.  It must have been stimulus detection.  I must have had a bunch of false alarms, thinking that there was a stimulus/beep.  Perhaps because I was expecting a beep, I made myself believe that there was a beep.
I like this chapter, I can not wait to learn more about sensation and perception.  It is something that we do every second of our lives.  Every time I smell, touch, hear, taste, or see something I begin to interpret it, describe it, and record it in my noggin.

Salvador Gutierrez P7 Oct. 18-22

This week in AP Psychology: I learned about how genetics influence who you are.  That genes determine most things about you.  There are numerous methods to study this.  There is the adoption studies, where adopted children compare themselves to their biological dad and to their other dad (the one who raised them).  Twin studies is to compare fraternal twins to identical twins.  Twin-adoption studies is to compare twins (fraternal and identical) who were separated at birth to those twins that were raised together.  Gene-by-environment studies is to study whether genetic differences mix with the environment to make certain behaviors in some but not others.  I believe that this is true, that genes are the primary factor in making you who you are.  Because I see similarities between me and my parents, grandparents, and other family members instead of seeing similarities between me and the environment.  Some argue that you are similar your parents and other family member because they taught you to be like that, but I believe that I inherited their traits and looks genetically.  It has been proven.  Identical twins who were separated at birth were almost completely similar in every way, even though they grew up in different environments.  Many argue that the environment influences you, but I think you influence the environment.  For example, I was born intelligent, so my parents encouraged me to do good in school.  They did not encourage me to do good in school, and so then I became intelligent.  They encouraged me because I was already intelligent.  In conclusion, genetics determine who you are and influences the environment.

Salvador Gutierrez P7 Oct. 11-15

This week in AP Psychology: we learned about mere exposure.  Mere exposure means that the more direct exposure you have with something, the more you prefer it.  This is in almost every single romantic comedy.  The two characters have nothing in common, they are bad for each other in every way, and they are not attracted to each other in any way.  They would spend time with each other and the audience laughs their butts off because the characters hate each other and they keep fighting with each other in a funny way, and there is the comedy.  They begin to have certain feelings for each other after spending some time together, and there is the romance.  This tends to happen to me with music.  At first I don’t like the music, but after listening to it some more it would “grow on me.”  The first time I heard Joy Division I did not like their music, but then I saw the movie “Control” and now I really really like Joy Division.  That movie played their music a lot, enough to make me like it now.  I think the reason we tend to like something after being exposed to it so much is because after a while, you begin to see the good qualities of the music, person, etc.  The movie “Control” showed me the creation of the band, the struggles they faced, and how cool their music was.  For example, they used a spray can for one of their songs.  They recorded someone spraying the can and then they would play the recording during the song at the concerts.  That is genius.  Using a unique sound like a spray can.  Another reason we tend to like something after being exposed to it so much is because we tend to like things we are familiar with.  Someone may not like filing papers but they have to do it every day.  After a year, they are asked if they want to do something else and they would most likely stay with filing papers because it’s what they know best.

Salvador Gutierrez P7 Oct. 4-8

This week in AP Psychology: we learned about altruism.  Altruism is selfless attitudes and behavior towards others.  I believe that no one in this world is truly selfless.  If you are completely truly selfless, you will die quickly.  To survive in this world you have to think of yourself and care for yourself.  When you’re in the middle of the desert with another person and you find an apple, you will have to think of yourself and take it instead of giving it to the other person or else you’ll die.  We learned about the black man that saved a guy from being run over by the subway train.  The black man’s act was not completely selfless.  It was kin selection because he put his children first, selfishly.  When he was asked why he saved the other man, he said that he did it because he did not want his daughters to see a man die.  I would not like it if everyone was altruistic because selflessness would lose its meaning.  In an episode of The Office, Dwight was being selfless and doing nice things to others (he would say, “You owe me,“ to everyone) and Andy would return the “selfless” kindness (for self-satisfaction).  Dwight would open the door for Andy, Andy would let Dwight go first, Dwight would insist that Andy goes first, Andy would insist that Dwight goes first etc.  It was annoying because they would not stop doing nice things to each other, it became a competition.  So Andy and Dwight would selfishly compete against one another on who’s more selfless.  They went from being selfless to selfish.  Which proves my point that no one can be truly selfless.  I honestly think that this whole thing on altruism and selflessness is a bit confusing and can be interpreted in many ways.  I just live by this: treat people the way you want to be treated.

Salvador Gutierrez P7 09/27-10/1

This week in AP Psychology, we learned about the Stanford prison experiment thingy. A couple of Stanford students participated in the experiment. They were told in advance that the experiment involved someone being a prison guard and another being a prisoner. Half of the students were assigned as the prison guards and the other half of students were assigned as the prisoners. The crazy thing is that the “prison guards” were really mean towards the “prisoners” and made them do humiliating things. The “prison guards” spent their ordinary days of their ordinary lives being kind, like always, but when they went back to the prison and put on the uniform, they were mean. They made the “prisoners” do pushups, act out scenarios like: Frankenstein hugging his wife, and many other things. The experiment was cut short because the students were really into their roles, the “prisoners” honestly believed they were real prisoners. The data from this experiment is that everyone has some evil in them and will show it under certain circumstances. This is very true. Take me for example. I am nice to everyone but I know for a fact that if I went to war, I would be somewhat evil towards the enemy. You also see this everyday, everyone will tease another person or talk bad about him/her behind his/her back. From now on, I’m going to be nice to everyone no matter what because I do not want them to become evil and be mean to me. It is like how Dane Cook said in that one joke about the weird guy in the office. That everyone would not talk with the weird guy, leave whenever he was present, and talk bad about him behind his back and spread rumors about him. But Dane Cook would give him a chocolate bar everyday. And the day came when the weird guy barged into the office and began shooting everyone, but he did not shoot Dane Cook. Instead, he thanks him for the chocolate.